The Death of Ivan Ilyich: A Summary of Tolstoy's Novella About Dying Well
What it is about
Published in 1886, The Death of Ivan Ilyich is a short novella by Leo Tolstoy, written not long after his religious conversion in the late 1870s. It is usually counted among the finest things he produced in his later years, and among the finest examples of the novella form in any language.
The story follows a high-court judge in nineteenth-century Russia through a terminal illness. Ivan Ilyich Golovin has done everything correctly by the standards of his class. He has studied law, married, risen through the ranks, secured a magistracy through the influence of a friend who has just been promoted, and furnished a pleasant home. Tolstoy sums up this career in one of the most quoted lines in Russian literature: Ivan's life has been "most simple and most ordinary and therefore most terrible."
The turn comes from something trivial. Hanging curtains in the new house, Ivan falls awkwardly and hurts his side. He thinks little of it. The pain does not go away. It grows, it sours his temper with his family, and eventually his wife insists he see a physician. The doctor cannot identify the cause. No definitive diagnosis is ever given, but it becomes clear the condition is terminal. Ivan tries remedy after remedy until the pain forces him to stop working and take to his bed.
What follows is the body of the book: a man who has never seriously thought about death being made to think about nothing else. He knows, abstractly, that people die. He discovers that knowing it and grasping it are different things.
The main characters
Ivan Ilyich Golovin is the judge at the centre. Tolstoy introduces him as neither as cold and formal as his elder brother nor as wild as his younger one, an intelligent, polished, lively and agreeable man. He is likeable precisely because he is unremarkable. As the illness advances he becomes introspective and emotionally raw, turning over and over the question of why this is happening to him.
Praskovya Fyodorovna Golovina is his wife. She is self-absorbed, and her concern for his suffering flickers on mainly when it starts to disrupt her own routines and plans. Their marriage was already something Ivan endured rather than enjoyed, which is part of why he buried himself in work.
Gerasim is the family's young butler, a peasant boy. He becomes Ivan's most devoted carer and the one real source of comfort in the house. He is the only person who speaks plainly about the fact that Ivan is dying, rather than maintaining the household fiction that he is merely unwell.
Pyotr Ivanovich is an old friend and colleague who studied law alongside Ivan, and one of the first to sense how serious the decline is. Ivan's children, Lisa and the younger son Vasia, move through the household around him, Lisa preoccupied with her betrothed Petrishchev. Vasia's compassion matters more than its small space on the page suggests.
The themes
The engine of the book is a question about moral accounting. Ivan reasons that he does not deserve what is happening, because he has lived rightly. If he had lived badly there would be a reason for the pain. Since he has not, the suffering must be arbitrary and senseless. Slowly that argument collapses, and he begins to ask whether his life really was a good one, or only a correct one.
Class sits underneath everything. The person who gives Ivan honesty and tenderness is a servant, while his social equals offer evasion and mild irritation. Tolstoy draws a sharp line between an artificial life, built on self-interest and the management of appearances, and an authentic life marked by compassion and sympathy. Ivan has lived the first. Gerasim lives the second without needing a theory of it.
There is also the matter of identity. Stripped of his office, his routines and his usefulness, Ivan has to work out what, if anything, is left of him. The answer is not flattering, and that is the point.
How it ends
Skip this section if you do not want the conclusion.
In his final days Ivan makes the split between the artificial life and the authentic one explicit to himself. Then some force strikes him in the chest and side, and he is brought into the presence of a bright light. His hand falls on his son's head and he feels pity for the boy. The hatred he felt for his wife and daughter gives way to pity too, and to the hope that his death will release them. With that, his terror of death leaves him. Tolstoy suggests death itself disappears.
Why it still matters
The novella is short, and it is relentless. Tolstoy takes the most ordinary life he can construct, built entirely from promotions, furnishings and social correctness, and asks what it is worth when the body fails. Because nothing about Ivan is exotic, the reader is given very little room to stand outside the story.
It has become a standard text in medical ethics and palliative care teaching, partly because of the doctors who cannot name the disease and the family who will not name the fact. The pretence that a dying man is only ill is treated as a cruelty, and the plain speech of a servant boy is treated as a kindness. That contrast has not aged.
It suits readers who want the force of Tolstoy without the length of the great novels, and anyone drawn to fiction that puts a direct question to the reader rather than simply telling a story.
More: More Leo Tolstoy posters